What Does It Mean to “hack” Something/somebody, Anyway?

JUST a bit of a foreword – I’m not sure how these posts are displaying in peoples’ emails. If you see seemingly misplaced numbers trailing words or punctuation in the email, odds are that number was intended to be superscript to indicate that there’s an end note associated with the previous point, and that you should now scroll down and read the aforementioned end note. If you see such numbers and they annoy you, you can open the blog post in your favourite internet browser0.1 using the link in the email, and the numbers should show up properly there.

The word “hack” has had many different meanings over the years.1 Originally and most commonly,2 when used as a verb, it was (and still is) used to describe the action someone would take when cutting wood, and is derived from a lot of different things.3 The noun, hacker, follows from this verb to mean somebody who hacks wood.4 Also probably following from the verb, a hack is either a tool which with a hacker may hack things or a person for hire to do routine work.5 Lots of new slang came of this, but most of it has since died out.6

Nowadays, “hack” is mostly just used to describe what somebody with questionable hygienic standards does with computers. At least that’s what I’m getting from the media. A few years ago, I thought that “hacking somebody” or “hacking” in general meant gaining access to a computer that was not yours without permission. Malicious activities usually followed suit. A lot of people I know, both young and not, used hack in this way for quite a while. Recently, however, I’ve noticed that the media uses the word to mean pretty much any computer activity that is not browsing the internet or using Microsoft Office.7 For example, at the Computer Science Club at my school, we received a call a few weeks ago from some woman who was looking for computer help. She had somehow gotten some nasty computer virus, and she was looking for this group of programmers at my school whom the media were calling hackers to help her fix her computer “because they knew how to hack”. I have absolutely no idea which definition of hack she was using. For all I know she was seeking specifically their help because she thought that these kids were proficient wood cutters and that this somehow extended to being able to rid computers of malicious software. I don’t know. But the media calling them hackers left room for somebody to become extremely confused, and somebody did exactly that. Programming conventions are now also called “Hackathons,” which makes some people think they’re something they’re not. Including me. The first time I heard of a “Hackathon” I thought it was when a whole bunch of hackers, both experienced and new,8 convening in a building to hack stuff, be it the same thing or not. It turns out I was wrong.9 Hackathons are actually events where people who like to program computers convene and make stuff, usually under a similar category or for a prize of some sort. These events are beginning to get quite large, meaning that they get more media coverage. Now that the media’s there AND the event is called a Hackathon, everybody there is a “hacker”. Unfortunately for these people, this adjective is not always viewed in the most positive light.10

Here’s a bit of a summary of what it all means (at least to me)11:

Thing that happens Meaning
I say “I’m hacking Gran Fran’s computer.”12 I’m gaining access to information on Gran Fran’s computer to which I do not normally have access.
*the media calls me a hacker and I HAVE NOT been arrested* I was programming something.
*the media calls me a hacker and I HAVE been arrested* I got caught gaining access to information on Gran Fran’s computer to which I do not normally have access.
I say “I’m going to go hack *object of non-computer variety*” I’m going to go hit *object of non-computer variety* with a hatchet.
I say “I’m going to go hack *object of computer variety*” see first row

Like many things in this language,13 the meaning of the word is entirely context-dependent. Sometimes the context provides two definitions and is ambiguous about which one it means, though, and then you’re right screwed. The moral of the story is we should take away the media’s right to use loosely-defined words. It only makes them worse.

0.1 All browsers other than Internet Explorer are acceptable. This end note is also a hint at what next week’s topic will be. Maybe. I might change my mind.

1 About six of them, to be precise.

2 I’m not sure if this is still the most common used of the verb, considering how the media misuses it.

3 I was going to tell you all of its roots, but there are so many and it seems like nobody’s really sure, so I’m just going to skip that part.

4 Or other things, I suppose. Would you still call someone a hacker if they were hacking at something not made of wood with a hatchet? Like a person? Or a misbehaving computer?

5 When used in the latter sense, it’s actually an abbreviation for “Hackney”, which was a word for “an ordinary horse”. It is believed that this word comes from the place Hackney, in Middlesex. Is there an Uppersex, too? What about a Lowersex?

6 I’m not actually entirely sure if people have stopped using hack as a derogatory adjective or noun yet. I just don’t recall ever hearing it used in such a way, so since I’m a know-it-all young person it must no longer be used in this way which is completely foreign to me.

7 I’ve omitted a few things here, but you get the idea.

8 See now I have to clarify which definition I’m using. This time I mean somebody who makes a habit of or has a history of gaining access to somebody else’s computer without explicit permission. That’s usually the definition I mean.

9 First time since 1973.

10 Especially if the people judging you are from, say, the United States Department of Defence (USDoD or DoD), the National Security Agency (NSA), the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI), the Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A), the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), the US Border Patrol (USBP), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Interpol, Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC), the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS), Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC), the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA), or the Canadian Forces Intelligence Branch (DND). (DISCLAIMER: This list is not all-inclusive. It may omit several agencies which would judge people negatively for having the term “hacker” associated with them. This is just the list of groups that sometimes interfere with malicious hackers)

11 I’m excluding the things I have deemed disused. If you have a question about a specific sentence, send it my way and I’ll try to decipher it.

12 I’m not.

13 English is a pretty sorry excuse for a language in several respects.

Potentially fun exercise (disclaimer: I have not tried it and cannot guarantee any level of entertainment from this): reread my blog post, using only the Hackney definition of hack.

Earth Is Flatulent and It’s Breaking Our Boats and Planes

I’m talking about the Bermuda Triangle.1

As you may know (see here if you don’t), there have been many reported cases of disappearing water and aircraft over this area of the ocean. There are a few supernatural explanations, but I’m somewhat partial to the natural explanations. I’ll talk about five of them here.

First is variations in Earth’s magnetic field which could have caused pilots and captains to inadvertently crash into some mystical invisible rock or solid cloud of doom. At first glance, this could make sense. It is (and has been for quite some time) well-known to sailors and pilots that magnetic North and geographic North are very seldom exactly the same2, and that they should take necessary precautions. Unfortunately for this theory, the differences are usually not so drastic as to cause serious issues, and there are several ways to work around the issue anyhow (especially with modern technology).3 Some people also theorize that there could be some strange magnetic anomalies happening in the area, but after some fairly thorough investigations run by the US Navy, it was determined that there are no magnetic discrepancies in the area. Sorry magnetism, but you don’t get this one.

Our next contender is the Gulf Stream, a sort of “underwater river” which travels as fast as 9km/h (5.6mph) on its surface, that occasionally carries things off their intended course.4 This is a completely viable issue if your boat is having engine troubles or if you land your plane on the water and then have engine trouble. Wouldn’t the primary cause of crash5 then be engine trouble, though? Thought so. So long, Gulf Stream, you can carry rubber ducks around6 as consolation.

We have to consider human error as well.7 This is a totally viable cause of crash or disappearance, but it’s no different than human error anywhere else, so it’s not unique to the area and as such doesn’t count. Sorry, humans.

Weather sometimes frequently causes problems with air and sea travel, too.8 Similarly to why human error doesn’t count, neither does weather. The only reason I didn’t block these two together is because some people believe that bad weather systems can be influenced or caused by supernatural sources.9

Now for my favourite: Methane bubbles sinking ships. It has been confirmed by some Australian scientists10 that enough methane rising to the surface of the water under a boat could sink it very quickly. The wreckage from these ships would then get carried away by our friend, the Gulf Stream.11 Some of the ships which have gone missing have been really quite large. For there to be enough methane to take down large ships, then it may also be possible for enough methane to be released into the atmosphere. Almost every single one of the instruments on a plane12 uses the air (or methane, in this case) outside to function. If these instruments are suddenly fed a whole bunch of methane, bad things could happen.13

So clearly the only really viable solution is that the Earth had some indigestion and farted a bunch, and this accidentally14 disappeared a bunch of people.

The Bermuda Triangle is an area of (mostly) open sea which spans between the Southern tip of Florida, the South Western corner of Bermuda, and the Northern coast of Puerto Rico.

2 After a study in 2000 it was found that the only areas in the entirety of the United States where geographic and magnetic North are identical are places which lie on a line from Wisconsin to the Gulf of Mexico.

3 Unfortunately for most of the notable Bermuda Triangle incidents, GPS didn’t exist until 1995, and as far as we know we don’t have (haven’t had?) time travel.

4 Much to my dismay, underwater submarine Gulf Stream Racing probably wouldn’t catch on very well. At least in part because light doesn’t travel through water particularly well, and this could make things like seeing the race difficult for non-fish viewers.

5 I don’t say disappearance, because we know where the Gulf Stream takes things, and nothing has been found along these areas that were supposed to have been in the Bermuda Triangle.

6 The Chinese released 29,000 rubber ducks into the Pacific Ocean in 1992. They never reached as far as the Gulf of Mexico to our knowledge, so I thought maybe we could make the Gulf feel better about not being responsible for disappearing ships by giving it some rubber ducks to float about.

7 If we don’t, somebody will probably get mad at me for accidentally implying that human error counts as a supernatural cause instead of a natural one, and I don’t feel like getting into that today. It would get overly philosophical, and then all I’d end up doing is throwing weird logical fallacies and tautologies and things at whichever poor soul had the misfortune of having a philosophical argument with a pedantic guy who isn’t bad at formal logic.

8 I went to Europe in the spring of 2010 with my school, and when we were on our way back a whole bunch of us (not me) got stuck in Europe for a few days because Eyjafjallajökul had a temper tantrum.

9 If I were to follow my own logic about including humans in this (see footnote 7), it would follow that I wouldn’t bother including weather because some people believe that supernatural forces can affect the weather. I’m including it because I do not concede that weather is caused by anything other than our atmosphere and various other forces. I might write an article about how weather works later – we’ll see.

10 Australia scares me. Most of the wildlife in Australia will kill people. I’m not sure how people – especially scientists who sometimes work with the aforementioned animals – survive down there. That and they’re upside down, and I’m not sure if you’ve spent much time upside down, but it makes your head hurt. I don’t recommend trying it.

11 Maybe you don’t need those rubber ducks then, Gulf Stream?

12 Not the musical kind of instrument. If you were to replace the altimeter (thing that says how high off the ocean you are) with a guitar, you’d probably find yourself joining Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens, and The Big Bopper in a fishy death.

13 “bad things” include, but are not limited to, severe turbulence, crashes, strange aircraft behaviour, and visitations from the Gods of Rock, Buddy Holly, Ritchie Valens, and The Big Bopper. All of the aforementioned “bad things” may cause bodily harm of degree ranging from minor to severe and causing death.

Could You Subsist Entirely on Vitamin Water?

Practically, probably not. Theoretically, also probably not.

The human body requires 13 vitamins to function properly:

  1. Vitamin A (Retinoids and Beta Carotene)
  2. Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid)
  3. Vitamin D (Calciferol)
  4. Vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol)
  5. Vitamin K (phylloquinone, menadione)
  6. Vitamin B1 (Thiamin)
  7. Vitamin B2 (Riboflavin)
  8. Vitamin B3 (Niacin)
  9. Vitamin B5 (Pantothenic Acid)
  10. Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxal, Pyridoxine, Pyridoxamine)
  11. Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin)
  12. Biotin
  13. Folate (Folacin, Folic Acid)

Note that we also require some other important things to survive, like minerals, sugar, carbohydrates, protein, etc.

Let’s pretend, for now, that we don’t need such silly things and that our metabolisms are 100% efficient and will not expel undigested vitamins and nutrients.

Coca Cola Refreshments, the people who make Vitamin Water, have lots of different vitamin cocktails:

Mega C

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin C 250
Vitamin B3 45
Vitamin B5 70
Vitamin B6 60
Vitamin B12 150

Focus

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin A 40
Vitamin C 100
Vitamin B3 20
Vitamin B5 35
Vitamin B6 30
Vitamin B12 80

Essential

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin B3 20
Vitamin B5 35
Vitamin B6 30
Vitamin C 250
Vitamin E 35
Folate 45

Energy

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin B3 45
Vitamin B5 70
Vitamin B6 60
Vitamin B12 150
Vitamin C 100

Multi-V

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin B3 20
Vitamin B5 35
Vitamin B6 30
Folate 45
Vitamin C 100
Vitamin E 35

Spark

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin B3 90
Vitamin B5 140
Vitamin B6 110
Vitamin B12 300
Vitamin C 250
Vitamin E 70

Restore

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin B3 45
Vitamin B5 70
Vitamin B6 60
Vitamin B12 150
Vitamin C 100

Defense

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin B3 20
Vitamin B5 35
Vitamin B6 30
Vitamin B12 80
Vitamin C 150

XXX

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin B3 20
Vitamin B5 35
Vitamin B6 30
Vitamin B12 80
Vitamin C 250

Go-Go

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin B3 90
Vitamin B5 140
Vitamin B6 110
Vitamin B12 300
Vitamin C 250
Vitamin E 35

Resilient-C

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin B3 20
Vitamin B5 35
Vitamin B6 30
Vitamin B12 80
Vitamin C 150

XOXOX

Vitamin % DV (2000 Calorie Diet)
Vitamin B3 20
Vitamin B5 35
Vitamin B6 30
Vitamin B12 80
Vitamin C 250

Unfortunately, without even going through the effort to figure out which drink would be best, I realize that you would probably die. You’d miss out completely on several of the vitamins you need to stay alive.

I’ve also come to the realization that the main difference between all the different vitamin waters is not the contents, but the flavour. XOXOX and XXX are the same, Resilient-C and Defense are the same, and Spark and Go-Go are almost the same. What differences do exist are fairly insignificant for the most part.

If you thought you were good at hide and seek…

think again.

Today marks the fifth day that Malaysian Airlines flight 370 has been missing without a trace. The areas being searched are now about the size of Portugal, and we have yet to find anything.

MH370 isn’t the only aircraft to have ever gone missing like this, though. There have been at least four other (Wikipedia has a really long list of things like this, but I’m not going through all of them) similar incidents.

First and foremost is Amelia Earhart. In 1937, Amelia attempted to circumnavigate the globe in her twin engine monoplane (really not a bright idea, if you ask me, but who am I to judge). She and her plane disappeared over the Pacific Ocean, never to be seen again.

Then, in 1962, Flying Tiger Line Flight 739 put on its invisibility cloak. This flight was supposed to carry 90 or so US military personnel from Guam to the Philippines, but it never landed. There was no distress call from the crew, and no wreckage or trace of a crash was ever found.

Let’s not forget the Bermuda Triangle, either. Many boats and planes have gone missing around the Bermuda Triangle (we know why it happens now, which is nice), but most of their wreckages have been found. In 1948 and 1949 respectively, two British South American Airways passenger jets went missing, presumably killing all 51 people aboard. In 1945, five American bombers were running a training mission and disappeared, along with the 13-man rescue crew sent to find them. No signs of any of these aircraft or their passengers have ever been found.

MH370 has some competition for the title of Hide and Seek Champion.

I would have had that title were it not for my poor hiding skills way back when…

Birthdays

I’d just like to make a quick little shout out to my Grandpa Norm and Great Grandma (usually just Grandma) Esther, whose birthdays it is today. I hope you both have an excellent day, see (or at least hear from) lots of relatives, and live to see another happy and healthy year.

Canada – Whose Idea Was It Anyway?

Some quick information about Canada:

  • Population: 35,158,300 (37th largest in the world)
  • Total Area: 9,984,670km2 (2nd largest in the world, but 891.163km2 (8.92%) of that is water)
  • Population Density: 3.41 people per square kilometer
  • Currency: Canadian Dollar
  • Date Format: all of them.
  • Government: Nobody really knows.
  • Legislature: Parliament (Senate Upper house and House of Commons Lower house)
  • Largest City: Toronto (Population: 5,586,064)
  • Languages: Canadian English and French

We have almost no people. If you add the populations of Metro Los Angeles and Metro New York (which just so happens to be about 200 thousand greater than the population of New York State, oddly enough), you get about the same as our population. Kind of weird, then, that we have the second largest land area, don’t you think? I mean, we have a density of 3.41 people per square kilometer. That means that if everybody were spaced out evenly, it would be about a 40 minute walk to the next person over if they stayed still (20 if they walked towards you too). Singapore’s got 7301 people per square kilometer. That’s about 137 square meters per person, or a square measuring 11.7 by 11.7 meters. It would take a few seconds to walk to the next person over.

Why don’t we share with the rest of the world somehow? I understand that a large portion of our land is nearly uninhabitable, but there’s still plenty of inhabitable land elsewhere. We’ve got lots of room for another city or ten. I’m sure our economy wouldn’t be too hard done by with another 40 million people, and I’m sure the rest of the world would be happy to spare the people.

Then there’s our currency, the Canadian Dollar – or should I say the poor man’s American Dollar? Last I checked nobody in the world particularly cares for our currency, and it’s worth nearly the same as an American Dollar. The only currencies more pointless than ours are the currencies in countries where the Euro is widely (and officially) accepted, and countries which only have their own currency for the sake of patriotism, and have its value pinned to that of the United States (*cough* Panama *cough*). There’s the occasional time our dollar spikes up to about 1.02 USD and we get all excited, but then somebody does a stupid and it falls back down to 0.88 USD again. Would it not be easier to just use the United States Dollar, the Euro (sod off, I know we’re not in Europe), or, even better, the Great Britain Pound. We take after them plenty as it is, why not add the cherry on top?

Almost everything about us comes from them (appropriate, I know, but whatever happened to being an independent, unique country?). We’re about as apologetic as them (though they tend to be more sarcastic about it), we line up just like them, we’re about as indecisive as them (we have three officially accepted date formats: dd-mm-yyyy, mm-dd-yyyy (like the US), and yyyy-mm-dd (Common Era Standard Format)), we look like them (Canadians of Native descent notwithstanding), and our Government is about as competent (or should I say incompetent?) and needlessly complicated as theirs. Our Government’s official type is “Federal Parliamentary Constitutional Monarchy”. From what I can understand, that means that we have the United Kingdom’s Monarchy there to help with our Constitution and damn near nothing else, and a useless piece of garbage pretend democracy to try to make us more like the United States of FUBAR.

I guess we can be happy that our language is fairly different from the other dialects of English, right? We have the letter u after o where the United States often doesn’t, we spell tyre with an i, and we spell kerb with a cu. Why, then, do most websites not have English (Canadian) as an option? Twitter has English (US) and English (UK), and Facebook has English (US), English (UK), English (Indian), and English (Pirate) (don’t believe me? see for yourself in the options on Facebook). Every time I go to a website or use some software (not MS Word, they have a button for English (Canadian)), it defaults to either English (US) or English (UK). That means that I either have to put up with a lot of missing u’s, or I have to put up with crisps instead of chips, tyre instead of tire, kerb instead of curb, and a whole plethora of other things.

Did I mention that we get a lot of things from our British parents yet? I’ve been complaining this whole time, go have a conversation with a Brit and see how long it takes before they start complaining about something. It’ll probably be the weather. At least you’ll be able to say your weather is worse.

So if all we really are is some tiny little country on a bunch of frozen, uninhabitable land that’s in the middle of transforming from British to American, why bother having us as an independent country anyhow? Why not just keep us as part of the UK along with Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales (for the love of God please don’t amalgamate us with the US)?

If only I knew what a Bitcoin was in grade 10

For those of you who don’t know what a Bitcoin is or are kind of confused about it, you can go to this website to learn more about it. They have a really cool instructional video.

On October 5, 2009, about a month after I had started grade 10, the very first trading price for Bitcoin was published by New Liberty Standard. The price for one Bitcoin (BTC) was $0.00076392443. That’s $1.00 for 1,309.03 BTC. People thought that price was outrageous and should be lowered. Today, on MtGox, one of the world’s most renowned BTC Exchanges, 1 BTC is worth about $630.00.

That’s a huge jump.

That means that if I had bought $1.00 worth of Bitcoins back on October 5, 2009, that $1 would now be worth $824,877.90. My crappy, slightly oxidized, dirty, bent, scratched loonie which weighed a total of about 7.00 grams, would now be 43.30515kg (95.4715 pounds) of $20 bills (plus a 10, a 5, a toonie, three quarters, a dime, and a nickel). Or, if I were to keep it in loonies, 5,171.97879kg (11,402.3lbs — about the weight of a small Adult Male African Bush Elephant).

If I had spent the $1000 that I probably saved up around then and used to buy a guitar or something to instead buy bitcoins, I’d have well over three quarters of a billion dollars.

Sometimes I really wish I had a time machine.

Changes to My Course Schedule

Greetings,

I come bearing news. Not particularly important news, but news nonetheless. I have made some significant updates to the Course and Co-Op Schedule. The updates include the following:

  • Aesthetic changes (no longer in table format; now more colourful)
  • Minor changes to what courses are being taken when
  • Now includes a credit count and what degree I intend to acquire

If any of these changes interest you or you wish to view the updated page anyway, click this link Course and Co-Op Schedule (WORK IN PROGRESS) or the link above.

I am also debating taking a minor in chemistry. I would need to stay an extra term after 4B (It would technically then be my 5A term, and would take place between May 2017 and August 2017) to complete this minor, but as it stands I may be staying an extra term anyway, so this isn’t an issue.